Most raw feeders try to create a diet that emulates, to a greater or lesser extent, the whole prey animal. And logically, this is what carnivores, even ‘facultative’ (able to eat non-prey food) carnivores like dogs are designed to eat.
This argument, although persuasive, is not the whole story, however. Dogs scavenge and hunt; they have throughout history and, if all the humans vanished from the earth, this is what they would go back to.
If you’re a hunter-scavenger, like a dog, wolf, dingo or hyena, then basically you eat anything edible. Unlike cats, who are ‘obligate’ (have to eat 100% prey material) carnivores, dogs just roam around hunting prey and looking for lunch, alive or dead or growing, wherever they can get it.
As you know, from watching your dog, they will eat horse, sheep and rabbit poo with great gusto. They will eat cat poo given half a chance. Obligate carnivores don’t; cats are never seen poo-eating, never seen picking berries off bushes or apples fallen in an orchard. Dogs, obviously, are not just big cats.
Some people, notably the ‘Prey Model’ brigade, will argue, with conviction, but little evidence, that dogs should be fed like cats. They insist on just using meat and prey-derived foodstuffs (organs, meat, bone) and the like. I reject this model. I don’t think you can just feed meat, bone and ‘organs’ and leave it at that.
The “80/10/10” feeding model, as well as ignoring some fruit, veg, grass and poo consumption, does not include hair, horn and hoof, other organs (brain, adrenals, eyes and testicles, for example), stomach and intestinal contents and soil.
Yes, dogs, would naturally eat soil – they naturally feed on the ground (soil). Why do you think they bury bones? To hide them for later, yes, but I also to give them a good muck-marinade in pro-biotic dirt—clever old things.
0 comments